Tuesday, April 29, 2008

Great Editorial about Annexation Moratorium

First the latest from the out of control cities of NC:

The Village of Marvin is at it again: http://www.charlotte.com/breaking_news/story/598820.html

Wendell Commissioners oppose moratorium plan

And now the good news:

The Editor of the Freedom Communication, Inc. Newpapers has published an excellent editorial in support of a temporary moratorium on forced annexation. This editorial has appeared in a number of their newspapers, including the Kinston Free Press and the Jacksonville Daily News. We need to thank them for being consistent supporters of property rights issues for years, including their support for putting an end to forced annexation.

'Forced' shouldn't be part of policy in free society

A temporary hold on annexations?

In a free society, property owners should have the legal status that would allow them to choose whether or not to be taken into a city or town.

April 28, 2008 - 6:34PM

Some encouraging news came out of a special legislative committee that is studying municipal annexations. The study panel wants the state to enact a one-year moratorium on involuntary annexations.

While we'd like to see forced annexations banned altogether, this moratorium proposal is a step in the right direction. It's just that the idea of "force" doesn't mix very well with the idea of a free society.

It's worth noting that a number of cities and towns across North Carolina don't use the involuntary annexation powers that the General Assembly has given. They should be commended.

But those that do use such powers should stop.For decades, municipalities across the state have used this power as a growth tool.

They decide that property that is outside their corporate limits is ripe for annexation, so they vote to swallow tracts of land into the city.

The problem with this method is that those being annexed effectively have little that they can do to stop this land grab. In a free society, property owners should have the legal status that would allow them to choose whether or not to be taken into a city or town.

That actually occurs quite often in North Carolina. Developers may be building an office park or residential community and believe that their projects will be more valuable if they have city services such as water and sewer or street lights. In that case, they will petition a city for annexation.

Likewise, an established community might desire the police and fire protection that a municipality has to offer and be willing to pay the extra taxes that annexation would demand. Complaints are held to a minimum when those types of voluntary annexation occur.

However, when neighborhoods or tracts of property are taken in against the will of those being annexed, the complaints go up. People feel that they've been violated and they have.

Over the years, many municipalities - including Jacksonville - have experienced sone heated battles over forced annexation, producing hard feelings that take a while to go away.

Supporters of an involuntary annexation moratorium will likely have their hands full when the General Assembly comes back into session next month.

Expect to see municipalities and supporters of this unfair growth tool fight the moratorium, or at least weaken it so that it's rendered ineffective.

While we'd like to see an elimination of involuntary annexation altogether, having a moratorium is a good first step.

Thank you Freedom Communications Editor!!

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for your feedback and insights!